LAS VEGAS, NV – Las week, Donald Trump turned heads nationwide when he proposed a ban on corporate investors purchasing single-family homes in response to the current affordability crisis facing many families hoping for homeownership in recent years.
For a very long time, buying and owning a home was considered the pinnacle of the American Dream,” Trump said last week in a post on his Truth Social platform. “It was the reward for working hard, and doing the right thing, but now, because of the Record High Inflation caused by Joe Biden and the Democrats in Congress, that American Dream is increasingly out of reach for far too many people, especially younger Americans.”
It is for that reason, and much more, that I am immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes, and I will be calling on Congress to codify it,” the post continued. “People live in homes, not corporations. I will discuss this topic, including further Housing and Affordability proposals, and more, at my speech in Davos in two weeks.”
And while such activity has impacted the residential real estate market to wildly varying degrees across the country – entities owning 100 or more properties account for just one percent of overall single-family housing stock nationally; it has been felt to a much more disproportionate degree in areas such as Southern Nevada.
Following the end of the mid-2000’s recession, nearly 500,000 homes have been purchased in the Las Vegas Valley by investors, with a recent study conducted by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) noting that this group – made up of mainly of Wall Street-backed companies – could own as much as 15 percent of all homes in the valley; that number increases to up to 25 percent in North Las Vegas, the report says.
Nevada real estate agents, experts, and lawmakers have reacted to Trump’s calls for an investor ban, saying that it would represent a potential “paradigm shift” if it were to take place.
It is past time that we ban large institutional investors from buying up our housing stock and driving up prices for families,” U.S. Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nevada) said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. “I have been pushing for this at the federal level for years and recently testified before the Nevada State Legislature about my work on this issue. Let’s get this done.”
I’ve been sounding the alarm for months as Wall Street drives up housing costs for Nevada families. If the President is serious about addressing this crisis, the solution is already on the table,” said U.S. Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nevada) on X.
It’s about time someone tried to do something,” said Las Vegas-area real estate agent Steve Hawks. “Hopefully now this puts more of a spotlight onto what’s going on, and Vegas has been hit the hardest by these hedge funds and corporate landlords.”
Director of UNLV’s Lied Center for Real Estate, Shawn McCoy, said that more research is needed in order to access how much impact corporate investment is affecting the affordability concerns currently plaguing the overall national housing market; however, he confirmed that Southern Nevada is indeed one of the hardest-hit in that regard in the entire country.
It remains difficult to distinguish between the small local investors from larger corporate buyers. As a result, housing researchers do not have a complete picture of the true extent of large-scale corporate ownership. And that distinction is critical when evaluating policy to restrict certain portions of investor purchases,” he said. “Las Vegas is a standout, investor activity in Las Vegas exceeds the national average and our report ranked Las Vegas amongst the top three metros in the country.”










